The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7810•James Henry Tinsley v. DOCTOR HARRIS, Attending Physician
06-7810Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 4, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7810
JAMES HENRY TINSLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR HARRIS, Attending Physician,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00730-JBF)
Submitted: May 16, 2007 Decided: June 4, 2007
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Henry Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa
Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James Henry Tinsley appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Tinsley v. Harris, No. 2:05-cv-00730-JBF (E.D. Va. Oct. 11, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.