The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7545•Willie J. Williams v. David Mitchell
06-7545Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7545
WILLIE J. WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID MITCHELL; MARGIE LAWLER; RICHARD TIRRELL
TERRY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RANDY LEE; D. S. LORD; W. D. SLEDGE;
MR. PERSON; JENNIFER H. LANGLEY; LEWIS SMITH,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00304-FL)
Submitted: July 31, 2007 Decided: August 28, 2007
Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie J. Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Willie J. Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Williams v.
Mitchell, No. 5:05-ct-00304-FL (E.D.N.C. July 26, 2005; Aug. 18 &
Oct. 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.