The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7541•Michael J. Ferola v. Director, South Carolina Department of Corrections
06-7541Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 12, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7541
MICHAEL J. FEROLA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS; MR. CLARK, Kitchen Supervisor;
WARDEN RUSHTON; MARTY BURRIS; BOB ANDERSON,
Lt.; LEROY CARTLEDGE, Associate Warden; L.
HOLMES, Grievance Coordinator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(0:03-cv-02918)
Submitted: December 22, 2006 Decided: January 12, 2007
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael J. Ferola, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE,
O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, P.A., Anderson, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Michael J. Ferola appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. However,
he directs this court’s attention to no specific errors in the
district court’s reasoning. Accordingly, pursuant to 4th Cir.
Local Rule 34(b), we affirm the district court’s order. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.