The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7503•Wilson O. Rogers, Iii v. SUPERINTENDENT CHERRY, Hampton Roads Regional Jail
06-7503Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7503
WILSON O. ROGERS, III,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SUPERINTENDENT CHERRY, Hampton Roads Regional
Jail; MRS. ESTES, Health Services Admin.,
Prison Health Services,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00620-RBS)
Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: March 1, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Wilson O. Rogers, III, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Wilson O. Rogers, III, appeals the district court's
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without
prejudice for failure to comply with the court's order. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Rogers v.
Cherry, No. 2:05-cv-00620-RBS (E.D. Va. Aug. 9, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.