The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7480•Jason Ashant’e Floyd v. HAMPTON REGIONAL JAIL, Medical Department (Dentist) (Name can’t remember) black female
06-7480Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 21, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7480
JASON ASHANT’E FLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HAMPTON REGIONAL JAIL, Medical Department
(Dentist) (Name can’t remember) black female,
Defendant - Appellee.
No. 06-7481
JASON ASHANT’E FLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
CITY OF NEWPORT NEWS, Police Department, and
Police Officer (Miezel),
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Walter D. Kelley, Jr., District
Judge. (2:06-cv-00300-WDK; 2:06-cv-00301-WDK)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 21, 2006
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason Ashant’e Floyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Jason Ashant’e Floyd appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. The
district court dismissed the actions without prejudice because
Floyd failed to provide the court with a current address. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Floyd v.
Hampton Reg’l Jail, No. 2:06-cv-00300-WDK (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 4,
2006 & entered Aug. 9, 2006); Floyd v. City of Newport News, No.
2:06-cv-00301-WDK (E.D. Va. Aug. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.