The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7456•Dennis Roger Vandyke v. LACY THORNBURG, Judge
06-7456Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 27, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7456
DENNIS ROGER VANDYKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LACY THORNBURG, Judge; RICK FOSTER, Attorney;
SCOTT ALDRIDGE, Probation Officer; J. R.
DAVIS, Police Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
District Judge. (1:06-cv-00200)
Submitted: February 21, 2007 Decided: April 27, 2007
Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Roger Vandyke, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Roger Vandyke appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Vandyke v. Thornburg, No. 1:06-cv-00200
(W.D.N.C. filed June 28, 2006 & entered June 29, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.