The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7451•United States of America v. Duane Jeleal Osbourne, a/k/a Duane Anthony Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed
06-7451Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 5, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7451
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DUANE JELEAL OSBOURNE, a/k/a Duane Anthony
Osborne, a/k/a Rocky, a/k/a Sealed Defendant
#12,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00178-12)
Submitted: August 30, 2007 Decided: September 5, 2007
Before MICHAEL, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duane Jeleal Osbourne, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Duane Jeleal Osbourne appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion filed
under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582 (West 2000 & Supp. 2007). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States
v. Osbourne, No. 3:95-cr-00178-12 (W.D.N.C. Aug. 4, 2006). We
grant Osbourne’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.