James David Faircloth, Sr v. RANDALL LEE, Superintendent

06-7391Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 11, 2007

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7391
JAMES DAVID FAIRCLOTH, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RANDALL LEE, Superintendent; WADE L. MOSELEY;
ALBERT MOSELEY, Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:05-ct-00021-FL)
Submitted: February 21, 2007 Decided: June 11, 2007
Before WILLIAMS, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James David Faircloth, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons,
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
James David Faircloth, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Faircloth v. Lee, No. 5:05-ct-00021-FL (E.D.N.C. July 25,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.