The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7345•United States of America v. Andrew Windsor
06-7345Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7345
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ANDREW WINDSOR,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior
District Judge. (1:90-cr-00228-TSE)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Andrew Windsor appeals the district court’s orders
denying his “Notice and Demand for the Clerk to Correct the
Record(s) [and] Notice of Withdrawal of Plea” and denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
orders. United States v. Windsor, No. 1:90-cr-00228-TSE (E.D. Va.
May 17, 2006; June 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.