The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7330•Charlton Javon Dowling v. State of South Carolina
06-7330Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 8, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7330
CHARLTON JAVON DOWLING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; PAUL W. GARFINKLE;
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL
SERVICES,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (0:06-cv-01309-PMD)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 8, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charlton Javon Dowling, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Charlton Javon Dowling seeks to appeal the district
court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss
the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Dowling v.
South Carolina, No. 0-06-cv-01309-PMD (D.S.C. June 28, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.