The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7321•United States of America v. Randy L. Toranzo
06-7321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 25, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7321
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RANDY L. TORANZO,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:02-cr-00075-F)
Submitted: November 22, 2006 Decided: January 25, 2007
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Toranzo, Appellant Pro Se. Frank DeArmon Whitney, United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Toranzo appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to correct alleged clerical errors in his final
judgment order pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed
the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See United States v. Toranzo, No. 7:02-cr-00075-F
(E.D.N.C. May 4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.