Paul McDonald v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 1949 . The

06-7208Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7208
PAUL MCDONALD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
LIEUTENANT R. FRIEND; OFFICER SHIMKO; SERGEANT
PERRY; TICHNELL, Chief of Security; JACOBS,
Mailroom Official; LIOBEL, Mailroom Official;
JON GALLEY, Warden,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (8:06-
cv-00968-PJM)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Paul McDonald, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Paul McDonald appeals the district court’s order denying
in part and granting in part his motion to supplement his claim and
denying his motion for a court order authorizing the use of
certified mail for all of his outgoing legal mail. This court may
exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291
(2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1292 (2000); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus.
Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order McDonald seeks to
appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or
collateral order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of
jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.