United States of America v. Guy Marion Williams, a/k/a Guy Marrion Williams

06-7202Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7202
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GUY MARION WILLIAMS,
a/k/a Guy Marrion Williams,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-7203
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
GUY MARION WILLIAMS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief
District Judge. (0:94-cr-00635-JFA; 3:94-cr-00923-JFA)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Guy Marion Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Chastain Wicker,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina,
Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Guy Marion Williams
appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2000) motion and a subsequent order denying his
motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Williams, Nos.
0:94-cr-00635-JFA; 3:94-cr-00923-JFA (D.S.C. June 1 & 19, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.