The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7174•Andre Sylvester Watts v. Terry O’brien
06-7174Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7174
ANDRE SYLVESTER WATTS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
TERRY O’BRIEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge.
(7:06-cv-00334-gee)
Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: November 7, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andre Sylvester Watts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Andre Sylvester Watts appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus and denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to
proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Watts v. O’Brien, No. 7:06-cv-00334-gee (W.D.
Va. May 31 & June 14, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.