The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7153•Nathaniel K. Johnson v. Patricia R. Stansberry
06-7153Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7153
NATHANIEL K. JOHNSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Joseph C. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:06-hc-02049-H)
Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 20, 2006
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nathaniel K. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Nathaniel K. Johnson, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed
in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02049-H (E.D.N.C.
June 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.