The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7129•ISAAC NICHOLAS, SSG, Sp. Ops v. National Security Agency, (nsa)
06-7129Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 23, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7129
ISAAC NICHOLAS, SSG, Sp. Ops.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY, (NSA),
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
(1:05-cv-02800-WDQ)
Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 23, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Isaac Nicholas, Appellant Pro Se. John Walter Sippel, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Isaac Nicholas appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant on his claim filed pursuant
to the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 1996 &
Supp. 2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Nicholas v. Nat’l Sec. Agency, No. 1:05-cv-02800-
WDQ (D. Md. May 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.