The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7042•Maurice Wayne Jones v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 1971 . - 2 - PER…
06-7042Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 12, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7042
MAURICE WAYNE JONES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:06-ct-03012-D)
Submitted: December 18, 2006 Decided: January 12, 2007
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Maurice Wayne Jones, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
*Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Wayne Jones appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his Bivens * complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jones v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-ct-03012-D (E.D.N.C. May 1,
2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.