The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-7040•United States of America v. Patrick Lewis Rudd, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie, a/k/a Louie
06-7040Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-7040
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
PATRICK LEWIS RUDD, a/k/a One-Eyed Louie,
a/k/a Louie,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (7:97-cr-00063-H-3)
Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 20, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick Lewis Rudd, Appellant Pro Se. J. Frank Bradsher, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Patrick Lewis Rudd appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his motion
to reinstate the appeal period. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Rudd, No. 7:97-cr-
00063-H-3 (E.D.N.C. filed May 13, 2006; entered May 19, 2006 &
filed May 15, 2006; entered May 18, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.