The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6975•United States of America v. Daniel A. Vogel, Jr
06-6975Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 3, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6975
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DANIEL A. VOGEL, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(2:91-cr-00440-DCN)
Submitted: October 6, 2006 Decided: November 3, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel A. Vogel, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker
Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Daniel A. Vogel, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying Vogel’s petition for writ of error coram nobis. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Vogel, No. 2:91-cr-00440-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 20, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.