The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6963•United States of America v. RAY WALLACE METTETAL, JR., a/k/a Steven Ray Maupin
06-6963Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 1, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6963
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
RAY WALLACE METTETAL, JR., a/k/a Steven Ray
Maupin,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (3:96-cr-50034-nkm)
Submitted: February 14, 2007 Decided: March 1, 2007
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Ray Wallace Mettetal, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order denying his Fed. R. Crim P. 41(g) motion for return of
property. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we grant Mettetal’s motion for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal and affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Mettetal, No. 3:96-
cr-50034-nkm (W.D. Va. May 3, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.