The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6920•Clarence Ricks v. Helen F. Fahey
06-6920Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6920
CLARENCE RICKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HELEN F. FAHEY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:06-cv-00153-RLW)
Submitted: October 17, 2006 Decided: October 20, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Ricks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Ricks appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply
with the court’s order. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Ricks v. Lahey, No. 3:06-cv-00153-RLW
(E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.