The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6916•Andy Lee Wright v. THEODIS BECK, State Secretary of North Carolina
06-6916Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 13, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6916
ANDY LEE WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THEODIS BECK, State Secretary of North
Carolina; BOYD BENNETT, Director of Prisons,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III,
District Judge. (5:05-CT-00543-D)
Submitted: January 5, 2007 Decided: February 13, 2007
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andy Lee Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Andy Lee Wright appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this
appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the
reasons stated by the district court. Wright v. Beck, No. 5:05-CT-
00543-D (E.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2005, and Apr. 6, 2006). We deny
Wright’s motion for default judgment; his request for an
independent counsel, which we construe as a motion for appointment
of counsel; and his motion to compel and for intervention, which he
submitted under Fed. R. Civ. P. 24. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.