Jesse Thomas Graham v. Glenda McCoy, R.n

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6823
JESSE THOMAS GRAHAM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GLENDA MCCOY, R.N.; SADIE CHAVIS, L.P.N.,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CHARLES STEWART, Dr.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:04-ct-00923-H)
Submitted: January 31, 2007 Decided: February 15, 2007
Before WILLIAMS and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jesse Thomas Graham, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, NORTH
CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

*We conclude we have jurisdiction over this appeal because
Graham timely indicated his intent to seek appellate review of the
district court’s order dismissing the complaint in his objections
to the Defendants’ bill of costs, and he designated both orders in
his amended notice of appeal filed within thirty days after the
district court’s final order awarding costs. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
3(c)(4); Smith v. Barry, 502 U.S. 244, 248 (1992).
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Jesse Thomas Graham appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and
awarding costs and nominal attorneys’ fees to the Defendants.* We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Graham v. Stewart, No. 5:04-ct-00923-H (E.D.N.C. Feb.
15, 2006; April 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --