The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6805•Leon A. Barbour, Jr v. VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden
06-6805Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 31, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6805
LEON A. BARBOUR, JR.,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, Magistrate
Judge. (3:05-cv-00219-MHL)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Leon A. Barbour, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Tara Louise Casey, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
*The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2000).
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Leon A. Barbour, Jr., formerly a federal prisoner,
appeals the magistrate judge’s* order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Barbour’s
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Barbour v. Adams, No.
3:05-cv-00219-MHL (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.