The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6794•Lawrence Fearon v. Hagerstown Trust Corporation
06-6794Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 10, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6794
LAWRENCE FEARON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HAGERSTOWN TRUST CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge
(8:05-cv-00921-AW)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence Fearon, Appellant Pro Se. William Joseph Carter, Michael
J. Sepanik, CARR MALONEY, P.C., Washington, D.C.; Alice Sung Hyon
Chong, BROWN & SHEEHAN, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence Fearon appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Fearon v. Hagerstown Trust Corp., No. 8:05-cv-
00921-AW (D. Md. Feb. 23 & Apr. 4, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.