The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6775•Elton Lee Williams v. Virginia Department of Corrections
06-6775Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 22, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6775
ELTON LEE WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; SERGEANT HAMILTON;
SERGEANT COLLINS; LIEUTENANT GALLIHAR; OFFICER ELY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (7:02-cv-00499-JPJ)
Submitted: February 25, 2011 Decided: March 22, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Elton Lee Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Mark R. Davis, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Elton Lee Williams appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action and
Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2006), claim. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Va.
Dep’t of Corr., No. 7:02-cv-00499-JPJ (W.D. Va. filed May 2,
2005 & entered May 3, 2005; November 29, 2005; March 21, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.