The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6763•United States of America v. Emmanuel Jerome Gardner
06-6763Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 21, 2007
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6763
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
EMMANUEL JEROME GARDNER,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (4:03-cr-00014-H)
Submitted: February 15, 2007 Decided: February 21, 2007
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Emmanuel Jerome Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Victoria
Watford-McKinney, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel J. Gardner appeals the district court’s amended
judgment entered pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 36. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Gardner, No. 4:03-cr-00014-H (E.D.N.C. Mar. 23, 2006). We further
deny Gardner’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.