Rudolph Holden v. Patricia R. Stansberry

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6753
RUDOLPH HOLDEN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY; HARLEY LAPPIN; P.
GUANJA, Regional Director; A. GONZALES,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief
District Judge. (5:06-hc-02004-FL)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 10, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rudolph Holden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Rudolph Holden, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000)
petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Holden v. Stansberry, No. 5:06-hc-02004-FL
(E.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --