The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6730•Joseph Louis McCoy v. MICHELLE MITCHELL, Sheriff
06-6730Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 29, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6730
JOSEPH LOUIS MCCOY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
MICHELLE MITCHELL, Sheriff; LIEUTENANT
WILKINS, Medical Supervisor; DEPUTY FORD,
Nurse; DEPUTY SMITH, Nurse; DOCTOR CHANG, MD;
DEPUTY ANDERSON, Nurse,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
Judge. (1:06-cv-00126-TSE)
Submitted: August 18, 2006 Decided: August 29, 2006
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Louis McCoy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Louis McCoy appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, alleging deliberate
indifference to medical needs, for failure to state a claim
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See McCoy v. Mitchell,
No. 1:06-cv-00126-TSE (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 3, 2006 & entered Apr.
4, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.