Curtis E. Crawford v. ROMAINE SMITH, Correctional Officer

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6647
CURTIS E. CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ROMAINE SMITH, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE,
Inmate,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 06-6650
CURTIS E. CRAWFORD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
C. SIMONS, Unit Manager Professional and
Individual Capacities; ROMAINE SMITH,
Correctional Counsel Professional and
Individual Capacities; JOHN DOE, Inmate,
Professional and Individual Capacities,
Defendants - Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

- 2 -
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:03-cv-00884-RBS-FB; 2:04-cv-307)
Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: July 3, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis E. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 2 of 3 --

- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), in which he
sought reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion to
reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the records and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See Crawford v. Smith, No. 2:03-cv-00884-RBS-
FB; Crawford v. Simons, No. 2:04-cv-307 (E.D. Va. Mar. 30, 2006).
We deny Crawford’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --