The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6640•Eugene Little v. Department of Corrections
06-6640Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 7, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6640
EUGENE LITTLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (5:06-cv-00035)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 7, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Little, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Little appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Little v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 5:06-cv-00035
(W.D.N.C. Mar. 24, 2006). We deny Little’s motion for appointment
of counsel and his motion for this court to intervene in his
grievance with the prison. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.