The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6618•United States of America v. Shahborn Emmanuel
06-6618Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6618
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SHAHBORN EMMANUEL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 06-7018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SHAHBORN EMMANUEL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Lacy H. Thornburg,
District Judge. (3:97-cr-00288)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shahborn Emmanuel, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Shahborn Emmanuel, a
federal inmate, appeals district court orders denying his motion
for sentencing credit and denying his motion for a transcript. We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and affirm
for the reasons cited by the district court. See United States v.
Emmanuel, No. 3:97-cr-00288-ALL (W.D.N.C. Feb. 24, 2006 & filed May
18, 2006; entered May 19, 2006). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.