Vernon Lamont Henley v. DAVID BARNES, Doctor

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6610
VERNON LAMONT HENLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DAVID BARNES, Doctor,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
District Judge. (7:05-cv-00663-jlk)
Submitted: September 29, 2006 Decided: October 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Vernon Lamont Henley, Appellant Pro Se. Rosalie Pemberton Fessier,
TIMBERLAKE, SMITH, THOMAS & MOSES, PC, Staunton, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Vernon Lamont Henley appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henley v.
Barnes, No. 7:05-cv-00663-jlk (W.D. Va. Mar. 24, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --