The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6608•STANFORD EL CHRISTOPHER MCPHERSON, JR., a/k/a Chris Rattis v. Joi Crystal Norfleet
06-6608Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 30, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6608
STANFORD EL CHRISTOPHER MCPHERSON, JR., a/k/a
Chris Rattis,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOI CRYSTAL NORFLEET; ERROL DAWSON JARMAN,
Agent, “S.B.I”; SCOTT DAVID SIKKINK, Det.;
TABITHA ANN ADKINS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior
District Judge. (5:04-ct-00713-H)
Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 30, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Stanford El Christopher McPherson, Jr., appeals the
district court’s order denying his attempt to file motions in his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint that had been dismissed in 2004.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. McPherson v. Norfleet, No. 5:04-ct-00713-H (E.D.N.C. filed
Mar. 28, 2006 & entered Mar. 29, 2006). We deny McPherson’s motion
for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.