The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6574•United States of America v. Jerome Walden
06-6574Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 20, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6574
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
JEROME WALDEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00063-JRS)
Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 20, 2006
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome Walden, Appellant Pro Se. Charles Philip Rosenberg, United
States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, David John Novak, OFFICE OF
THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jerome Walden appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motions seeking a certificate of appealability and to hold his
claims in abeyance. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Walden, No. 3:95-cr-00063-JRS
(E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006; Mar. 21, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.