The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6546•United States of America v. SAMUEL L. HUCKS, JR., a/k/a Junie Boy
06-6546Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 6, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6546
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SAMUEL L. HUCKS, JR., a/k/a Junie Boy,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:98-cr-00047-JBF)
Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 6, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Samuel L. Hucks, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert J. Groner, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Samuel L. Hucks, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of his sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Hucks, No. 2:98-cr-00047-JBF (E.D. Va. Jan. 24, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.