The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6441•United States of America v. Duane Montrik Burton
06-6441Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 24, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DUANE MONTRIK BURTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (7:00-CR-105-1-F)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Duane Montrik Burton, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Duane Montrik Burton appeals the district court’s sealed
January 31, 2006, order denying his sealed motion dated December
21, 2005. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Burton, No. 7:00-
CR-105-1-F (E.D.N.C., Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.