The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6411•Devinche Albritton v. THOMAS S. WILLIAMS, Sergeant, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office
06-6411Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 6, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6411
DEVINCHE ALBRITTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THOMAS S. WILLIAMS, Sergeant, Virginia Beach
Sheriff’s Office; EDWARD C. RONAN, Master
Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PAUL LANTEIGNE, Sheriff; VIRGINIA BEACH
SHERIFF’S OFFICE; CORPORAL KNOX, Virginia
Beach Sheriff’s Office; CORPORAL RANDOLPH,
Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office; PAMELLA K.
BUSSE, Deputy, Virginia Beach Sheriff’s
Office; ERIC M. CALHOUN, Deputy, Virginia
Beach Sheriff’s Office; B. STROMER, Deputy,
Virginia Beach Sheriff’s Office,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:05-cv-00344-JBF)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: September 6, 2006
Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
DeVinche Albritton, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, Lisa
Ehrich, PENDER & COWARD, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
DeVinche Albritton appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Albritton v.
Williams, No. 2:05-cv-00344-JBF (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2006). We deny
Albritton’s motion for oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.