The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6380•Joseph Ziadeh v. Richbourg’s Sales
06-6380Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 31, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6380
JOSEPH ZIADEH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RICHBOURG’S SALES AND RENTALS, INCORPORATED,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:05-cv-00783-RLW)
Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: October 31, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Ziadeh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Joseph Ziadeh appeals the district court’s order
dismissing without prejudice his civil complaint for failure to pay
the filing fee and denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e)
motion to alter or amend the district court’s previous order
denying his request to proceed in forma pauperis. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Ziadeh v.
Richbourg’s Sales & Rentals, Inc., No. 3:05-cv-00783-RLW (E.D. Va.
Feb. 13, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.