The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6357•066357.U
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6357
CLINTON BURNS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
JOHN J. LAMANNA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (4:05-cv-03163-HMH)
Submitted: June 15, 2006 Decided: June 20, 2006
Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clinton Burns, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Clinton Burns, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s orders accepting the report and recommendation of a
magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition
without prejudice and denying reconsideration of that order. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Burns v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03163-HMH
(D.S.C. Jan. 19, and Jan. 31, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.