United States of America v. William C. Gamble

06-6334Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 30, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6334
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WILLIAM C. GAMBLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (6:01-cr-00820-HMH-AL)
Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: June 30, 2006
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William C. Gamble, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton,
Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
William C. Gamble appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for modification of his sentence. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Gamble, No. 6:01-cr-00828-HMH-AL (D.S.C. Feb. 7, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.