The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6321•United States of America v. Shahborn Emmanuel, a/k/a Lord Shahborn Emmanuel, a/k/a Michael O’Neil
06-6321Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 24, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6321
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
SHAHBORN EMMANUEL, a/k/a Lord Shahborn
Emmanuel, a/k/a Michael O’Neil,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees,
Chief District Judge. (5:95-cr-00006-2)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 24, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shahborn Emmanuel, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C. F. Shappert,
United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Shahborn Emmanuel appeals a district court order denying
his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. We have reviewed the
record and the district court order and affirm for the reasons
cited by the district court. See United States v. Emmanuel, No.
5:95-cr-00006-2 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 2, 2006). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.