The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6317•Timothy Grimes v. Red Onion State Prison
06-6317Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 15, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6317
TIMOTHY GRIMES,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
RED ONION STATE PRISON; DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS; DANNY DAMRON; RONALD FOWLER; JAY
MCCONNELL; ALAN MCCOWAN; JEFFREY PHILLIPS;
ERIC SMITH; WILLIAM SYKES; DAVID TAYLOR; PAGE
TRUE, Warden; WILLIAM WRIGHT; RANDY BOYD,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District
Judge. (7:05-cv-00036-SGW-MFU)
Submitted: October 18, 2006 Decided: November 15, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Timothy Grimes, Appellant Pro Se. William W. Muse, Assistant
Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
- 2 -
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 2 of 3 --
- 3 -
PER CURIAM:
Timothy Grimes appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Grimes v. Red Onion
State Prison, No. 7:05-cv-00036-SGW-MFU (W.D. Va. Feb. 7, 2006).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.