The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6273•United States of America v. Walter Louis Ingram
06-6273Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6273
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
WALTER LOUIS INGRAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert N. Maletz, Senior District Judge.
(1:92-cr-00116-HNM-1)
Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Walter Louis Ingram, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Walter Louis Ingram appeals a district court’s order
denying his motion for resentencing and to correct erroneous
information in the presentence investigation report. The district
court was without jurisdiction to do either. Accordingly, we
affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.