The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6200•Keith Russell Judd v. USA, United States of America
06-6200Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 26, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6200
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
USA, United States of America, et al,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,
District Judge. (3:00-cv-00034-WCB)
Submitted: April 20, 2006 Decided: April 26, 2006
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Russell Judd, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow,
Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Keith Russell Judd appeals the district court’s order
denying his motions for relief from judgment. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Judd v. United States,
No. 3:00-cv-00034-WCB (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 4, 2006). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.