The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-6199•Lawrence E. Scible v. WILLIAM HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correctional Center
06-6199Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 4, 2006
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6199
LAWRENCE E. SCIBLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville
Correctional Center,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior
District Judge. (2:04-cv-00092-REM)
Submitted: August 31, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006
Before TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Lawrence E. Scible, Appellant Pro Se. Colleen Anne Ford, OFFICE OF
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
-- 1 of 2 --
- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Lawrence E. Scible appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Scible v.
Haines, No. 2:04-cv-00092-REM (N.D. W. Va. Jan. 20, 2006). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.