Jonathan Wesley Cupp, Sr v. WILLIE J. BAMBERG, Deputy Director, in their individual

06-6191Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2006

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6191
JONATHAN WESLEY CUPP, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIE J. BAMBERG, Deputy Director, in their
individual and official capacity as OCRDC
employees; HORACE JAMES, in their individual
and official capacity as OCRDC employees;
JOSEPH CHISOLM, in their individual and
official capacity as OCRDC employees,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (2:04-cv-02487-PMD)
Submitted: March 23, 2006 Decided: March 31, 2006
Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Wesley Cupp, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Christy Scott
Stephens, BOGOSLOW, JONES, STEPHENS & DUFFIE, PA, Walterboro, South
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan Wesley Cupp, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Cupp v.
Bamberg, No. 2:04-cv-02487-PMD (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2006). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.