Demetric Gray Pearson v. United States District Court for the District of Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6182
DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT
OF MARYLAND; STATE OF MARYLAND COURT OF
SPECIAL APPEALS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:05-cv-03317-RDB)
Submitted: September 26, 2006 Decided: September 29, 2006
Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) as
frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the
record and find that the appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See
Pearson v. U.S. Dist. Ct., Md., No. 1:05-cv-03317-RDB (D. Md.
Jan. 11, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --