Randy L. Valentine v. J. T. BURGESS, Detective

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6025
RANDY L. VALENTINE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
J. T. BURGESS, Detective,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
Judge. (CR-05-1157)
Submitted: March 30, 2006 Decided: April 10, 2006
Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randy L. Valentine, Appellant Pro Se. W. Howard Boyd, Jr.,
Jennifer D. Eubanks, GALLIVAN, WHITE & BOYD, P.A., Greenville,
South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

- 2 -
PER CURIAM:
Randy L. Valentine appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Valentine v. Burgess, No.
CR-05-1157 (D.S.C. Dec. 20, 2005). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --