The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
06-5095•Shannon Bridget Murphy v. CIRCUIT COURT OF CABELL COUNTY, West Virginia
06-5095Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 6, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1756
SHANNON BRIDGET MURPHY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CIRCUIT COURT OF CABELL COUNTY, West Virginia,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:07-cv-00587)
Submitted: November 20, 2008 Decided: November 25, 2008
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shannon Bridget Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Shannon Bridget Murphy appeals the district court’s
order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing this civil action for want of subject matter
jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Murphy v. Circuit Court, No. 3:07-cv-
00587 (S.D.W. Va. June 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.